Chris Rock & The Oscars

Prophet

Aftershock
Staff member
Joined
Jan 12, 2005
Messages
2,406
Location
Northern California
From: Huff Post Entertainment

Tyrese Gibson is urging Chris Rock to step down as this year’s Oscars host.

Gibson, 37, weighed in on the controversy surrounding the Oscars for the lack of diversity among nominees, saying people need to start taking a stand — and it should start with Rock.

“There is no joke that he can crack. There is no way for him to seize the moment and come into this thing and say, ‘I’m going to say this and say that I’m going to address the issue but then I’m still going to keep my gig as the host,’” Gibson tells PEOPLE. “The statement that you make is that you step down.”

The singer compared the issue to conversations over gay rights, claiming that if roles were reversed and members of the LGBTQ community were excluded from the Academy Award ceremony, action would have already been taken.

“If the host Chris Rock was a homosexual he would have stepped down already,” he said.

Gibson praised the likes of Spike Lee and Jada Pinkett Smith, who have spoken out about the controversy, but said more needs to be done than simply voicing one’s opinion.

“If you have a problem with feeling like you’re being excluded, all across the board, you don’t just sit on your hands and complain,” he explained. “You fix it.”

But as important as the issue is, Gibson said he also feels bad for the actors who deserve their spot on the nominee list, and their recognition is being clouded by the controversy — namely his friend Leonardo DiCaprio.

“I feel bad on behalf of Leo that I believe this is going to be the year that he finally wins an Oscar for best actor and this is all going down,” he said.

Gibson concluded by clarifying the outrage, saying it’s not about combating the Oscars, but simply standing up for what is right.

“This is not us saying we’re against the Oscars,” he explained. “We’re just saying, ‘This is not cool.’ You can’t be doing this in 2016 and acting as if no one is going to notice.”

=========================================================================

So what does everybody think? I noticed a big divide, and I even find myself at odds with the whole thing. In terms of there being more people of color recognized for their work, I definitely do agree..I mean just comparing the Golden Globe Nominees to the Academy Award Nominees we can see a distinct difference, so I get what's being said.

However, I get the power that the media has over the way we perceive ourselves and how we feel about ourselves, but at the end of the day, all of these people have something to say over the frickin' Oscars, which let's be clear, isn't necessarily indicative of true talent even when the nominees are right. It always seems like a crap shoot of people put together.

Also, there was a lot of talk about Jada Pinkett Smith being upset because her husband wasn't recognized so she is experiencing a lot of backlash as well.

I was wondering what everybody thought about this whole situation?

I personally think it's so close to the Oscars, from a professional standpoint, it's more than just taking a stand, he has a family, who cares if he has millions already, that money and that commitment he made is going to inevitably be helping to take care of his family and the people around him. It seems like he is in an impossible situation. I think he should still do the job he agreed to do, because it's a whole production, there are other people's jobs and livelihoods and things like that to consider.
 
The problem is you have a bunch of old white men (the majority are 60+ if I am not mistaken) which are simply out of touch with the movie going audience and what the general idea of an Oscar-worthy, or Oscar-caliber movie/performance is. Further, I would wager the vast majority have not seen the films/performances which were not nominated. The problem is not Hollywood bias- it's OLD Hollywood.

Regarding Chris Rock. Honestly, I feel if he dropped out no one would know. Very few people know or care about who hosts the Oscars until the see it or read about it the next day. The few in attendance would, and it would make some headlines, but if Rock were to "Gervais it up" it would have a much wider reach than simply not showing up for the event.
 
#1 Tyrese Gibson is just trying to act like he's relevant and get some press for himself. Spike Lee is a racist and I've lost the great respect I used to have for him as a director.

The Oscars (and awards shows in general) are not known for picking the people who really deserve it - it's all about what films the big media companies want to promote. Having said that - this whole thing is pretty ridiculous. It's the freaking Oscars. No, Chris Rock should not back out because he's a professional and should honor his commitment.
 
The other thing that chaps me is that people are complaining that Idris Elba should have been nominated. Get real. There was ZERO chance that the academy awards would ever nominate a movie created by an online streaming service. That was never going to happen.
 
I believe that Idris Elba deserves it, but I don't think it was gonna happen. And not because he's Black, because of the movie he was in.
 
I believe that Idris Elba deserves it, but I don't think it was gonna happen. And not because he's Black, because of the movie he was in.
Exactly. There are actually a few people that should have deserved at least a nomination but didnt receive one. I honestly think Walton Goggins should have got a supporting nod, he made the second half of that movie.
 
I liked this.. from Variety:

Stephen Furst, the actor known to many as Animal House's Flounder and Babylon 5's Vir Cotto, has become one of the Academy's first constituents to publicly push back against the forthcoming membership and rules overhaul, alleging ageism and sexism in the process. With an open letter published via Variety, the actor-director protests the organization's damage control, saying he feels "saddened, as well as offended, to learn the Academy Board of Governors has chosen to scapegoat the older members of the Academy in order to deflect the criticism about the lack of diversity this year in the nominees for Academy Awards."

Furst doesn't like the generalities made about his demographic as of late, noting he nominated "Straight Outta Compton, Beasts of No Nation, Abraham Attah, Zoe Saldana, Jason Mitchell, and Tessa Thompson" for kudos. Also, he highlights the Academy's definition of "inactive" as troublesome and claims the award show's inclusion problem "is an integrity issue, not a racism issue."

Here's an excerpt of his argument:

One of the main reasons for the lack of diversity in nominees this year is that many members vote without watching all the films. I probably am in a minority myself, because I watched 95% of the screeners sent out. That’s the minority you should be focusing on preserving, because that’s how you preserve integrity in the nominations. But I seriously doubt that ANY member of the Academy refuses to nominate someone because of their race, ethnicity or gender. ... The Academy does not have power over what films producers and studios make, but the Academy can take steps in assuring that member see a certain percentage of films before they are allowed to vote. Those who don’t are the people that should have their vote taken away for that season.​

His solution:
Doing away with screeners and streaming the films with a password that allows the Academy to keep a tally on how many films a member actually watched would be a much better way to promote fairness in the nomination process.​


I think the streaming the films with a password is actually a great idea. That way at least you could monitor who watched what - and for how long. I do agree that a large part of the problem is that movies, and performances, aren't being seen. This could be a step to rectify that at least.
 
I totally agree with you, and with what he said. I also think a lot of people don't know who the Academy members actually are. They just assume it's a bunch of old white straight men, and that's not really the case, at least from the people I know who are members.
 
Back
Top